Mahendra Daji Saitavadekar v. The State Of Maharashtra

31-IA-442-24+.DOC Sayali Upasani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 442 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2905 OF 2021 Mahendra Daji Saitavadekar ...Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Beerta H. Bajwa, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. S. S. Ghag, APP for State-Respondent.

CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED:- 30th JULY, 2024 PC :- 1) The learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 points out that initially, he had given an undertaking to deposit the amount in this Court which he failed to deposit and, therefore, the order of granting anticipatory bail was cancelled which resulted in the arrest of the 1/2

31-IA-442-24+.DOC applicant. It is pointed out that after the applicant was arrested, he obtained regular bail and deposited the amount in the Sessions Court. 2) In the circumstances, the only ground to cancel the bail is that he did not fulfil the undertaking, which does not not sustained. Since there is no merit in the present application, the application is rejected. [ANIL S. KILOR, J.] 2/2