Mehul Pravin Vaya v. State Of Maharashtra

27-ABA-350-2024.doc Prasad Rajput (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 350 OF 2024 Mr. Govind Omprakash Soni .. Applicant

Versus

State Of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 540 OF 2024 Mehul Pravin Vaya .. Applicant

Versus

State Of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................

 Mr. Sudip Pasbola i/b Ms. Naina Sharma, Advocate for Applicant  Mr. Yogesh Devnani, Advocate for Intervenor.

 Ms. Shilpa K. Gajwe-Dhumal, APP for State.

 Mr. Rahul Hankare, PSI, Vanrai, Police Station. ...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JANUARY 06, 2025 P.C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Pasbola, learned Advocate for Applicant, Mr. Devnani, learned Advocate for Intervenor and Ms. Gajwe-Dhumal, learned APP for the State.

2.

Considering the spate of the orders passed in the present matter and the facts which have transpired in the interregnum, I have impressed upon the parties to take appropriate instructions and inform the Court accordingly. Mr. Pasbola will take instructions and inform

27-ABA-350-2024.doc the Court as to whether Applicant is ready and willing to pay the amounts contained in the 4 balance cheques which was the part of the settlement arrived at between the parties in the interregnum after filing of the present Anticipatory Bail Application. Learned Advocate for Private Respondent shall take instructions and inform the Court accordingly. The impression given is that this Court has been relegated to a Recovery Court. This will need to be looked into. 3.

In the meanwhile ad-interim relief granted earlier, if any, to continue till next date.

4.

List this matter on 27th January, 2025 under the caption "For Directions".

P.R. Rajput [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]