Ravindra Kashinath Patil v. State Of Maharashtra

73 ABA-3358-2023 (2).doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date:

2025.07.24 15:03:55 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3358 OF 2023 Dhanesh Kashinath Bhandurge ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 790 OF 2024 Ravindra Kashinath Patil ...Applicant In the matter between:

Dhanesh Kashinath Bhandurge ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

**** Ms. Nikita Chavan h/f. Mr. Sawrabh Ghag, for the Applicant in ABA. Ms. R.S. Tendulkar, APP for Respondent/State. None for Intervener/Applicant in IA.

PSI Anant Parage, Panvel City Police Station, present. **** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.

DATE : 23rd JULY, 2025 P.C. :

1.

Heard counsel for the Applicant in ABA/3358/2023 and learned APP for Respondent State. None appears for the Intervener/Complainant despite matter being listed and name of the Advocate shown on the cause-list.

2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits on instructions that since 'C' Summary report has been filed in the case, she has Husen

73 ABA-3358-2023 (2).doc instructions to withdraw the Anticipatory Bail Application. 3.

The Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn. Interim/Ad-interim protection granted earlier, stands vacated. 4.

In view of above, nothing survives in interim application (intervention) and the same is also disposed of. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Husen