Ghanshyam Manohar Patekar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Shubhada S Kadam 5-IA-948-2024-ABA-1995-2023-INTERVENTION (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 948 of 2024 in ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1995 OF 2023 Ghanshay Manohar Patekar ... Applicant/ Intervenor In the matter of Prashant Murlidhar Raje ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent None for the Intervenor.

Mr. Mohd. Ahmed along Ms.Sofiya Shaikh, Advocates for the Applicant. Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for Respondent-State.

Mr. Vilas Shelke, PI, Charkop Police Station. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 24th JANUARY, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for respondent-State.

2.

Considering the reasons mentioned in the intervention application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of.

3.

Necessary amendment be carried out within one week from today.

Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2025.01.24 17:37:26 +0530 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM 1/1