Haresh Laxman Payer v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

18-aba-383-24 Gokhale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 383 OF 2024 Shyam Kaluram Bhoir & Anr.

..Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 993 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 383 OF 2024 ______ Mr. Kedar J. Patil a/w. Sakshi S. Kadam, Gargi Joshi and Pratik Tare for Applicants.

Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for State/Respondent. ______ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 5 SEPTEMBER 2024 P.C. :

1.

The first informant has filed an intervention application. He wanted to appear as a party in person. Today, he is not present before the Court. The committee, constituted to verify whether a party in person can appear before the Court and can assist the Court; has given a negative report. It is mentioned that, in the Committee's opinion, it would not be proper to grant him permission to appear before the Court.

Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:

2024.09.06 11:02:09 +0530 VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE

18-aba-383-24 2.

Therefore, to afford him one opportunity to engage an advocate, today I am adjourning the matter.

3.

Stand over to 10.10.2024.

4.

Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)