Chetan Ratilal Thakkar v. The State Of Maharashtra

3-IA1662-2024INABA3631-2023.DOC SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Santosh SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.11.13 12:14:13 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1662 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3631 OF 2023 Chetan Ratilal Thakkar ...Applicant In the matter between Mangalram Pratapji Purohit ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Ms. Sanjana Pardeshi, for the Applicant.

Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for the State.

Ms. Mallika Ingale, for Respondent No.3.

API Mr. Dinesh Chavan, Borivali Police Station, present.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

22nd OCTOBER, 2024 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the applicant seeks time to file an additional affidavit to deal with the contentions in the intervention application filed by respondent No.3. Since the first informant has been impleaded as a party respondent to this application, the first informant was not required to file an application for intervention.

3.

IA/1662/2024 thus stands disposed.

1/2

3-IA1662-2024INABA3631-2023.DOC 4.

The pleadings in the application for intervention and the documents annexed thereto shall be treated as the affidavit-inreply on behalf of respondent No.3. 5.

The applicant is at liberty to file an affidavit to deal with the contentions in the aforesaid affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of respondent No.3, within a period of three weeks from today. 6.

ABA/3631/2023 stand over to 23rd November, 2024. 7.

Interim protection, granted earlier, shall continue to operate till next date.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2