← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/1752/2024disposed off

Gautam Prakashbhai Maru v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025-02-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige2 pages

Shubhada S Kadam 31-IA-1752-2024 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1752 OF 2024 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2544 OF 2021 Gautam Prakashbhai Maru ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Jitendra Tiwari i/b. Ms. Kusum Pandey, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Poonam P. Bhosale, APP for Respondent-State. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 7th FEBRUARY, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

By this application, the applicant is seeking modification of the order dated 27th July 2022 passed by this Court (Coram : Bharati Dangre, J.).

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that by the said order, this Court has imposed condition No.(c) by which the applicant was directed to mark his attendance to the Investigating Officer on first Monday of the trimester between 10.00 am to 1.00 p.m.. Learned counsel further submitted that the investigation is completed and charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant, yet charge has not been framed. The applicant is attending the Trial Court dates regularly. Hence, requested to allow the application.

Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2025.02.07 19:13:37 +0530 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM 1/2

Shubhada S Kadam 31-IA-1752-2024 (CR).doc 3.

Learned APP strongly objected to allow the application. 4.

I have heard both learned counsel.

5.

The investigation is completed in the present case, chargesheet has been filed against the applicant, yet charge has not been framed. The applicant is attending the Trial Court dates regularly. 6.

In view of above, the bail condition No.(c) is modified as under :

(c) The applicant shall remain present before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

The interim application is allowed in above terms and disposed of.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 2/2