Satling Gangadhar Ingole v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

1 / 2 32-IA-1830-24-IN-APEAL-1054-17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1830 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1054 OF 2017 Satling Gangadhar Ingole .... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondents .......

• Mr. Sumedh S. Modak i/b. Vijay Killedar, Advocate for Applicant.

• Mr. Prashant P. Jadhav, APP for the State/Respondent. • Mr. S. K. Halwasia a/w Dipsikha Deka, Advocate for Respondent No.2/Passport Authority.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 12th AUGUST, 2024 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for Respondent No.3 makes a statement that the Applicant is already granted passport for a period of one year from 15/05/2024.

2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant states that he needs Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date:

2024.08.14 15:07:14 +0530 MANUSHREE NESARIKAR passport for a longer duration, so that he could obtain Visa for travelling to USA. He submitted that the specific prayer to that Nesarikar

2 / 2 32-IA-1830-24-IN-APEAL-1054-17 effect for a particular period is not mentioned in this application. But since he has already received the passport, this particular application becomes infructuous. He seeks permission to withdraw this application as having rendered infructuous, with liberty to prefer another application seeking renewal of passport or issuance of passport for specific long period. With such liberty, the application is disposed of as withdrawn. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)