Raghvendra Sheena Shetty And ANR. v. Sheshrao Pandharinath Sangle And ORS.

DTG 42--ii-Ia-1912-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1912 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9946 OF 2024 Raghvendra Sheena Shetty & Anr.

... Applicants V/s.

Shehsrao Pandharinath Sangle & Anr.

... Respondents _______________________________________ Mr. Sanjog Parab, Senior Advocate a/w Adv. Burzin Bharucha, Adv. Kaushal Popat, Mr. Navnath Parkhe i/b White and Brief Advocates and Solicitors for Applicants/Appellant.

Mr. Sanjeev Kadam, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Prashant Jadhav, Ms. Madhusmita Sahoo, Mr. Hamid Ansari & Mr. Shrunkhal Pashte for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Smt. Prajakta P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.4 and 6-State. Mr. Dhawal Patil a/w Mr. Yash Sutaria i/b Ms. K. Ashar & Co. for Respondent No.5.

_______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ.

DATE : 5th March 2026 P.C. :

1) This is an Application for condonation of delay of 32 days in preferring Appeal against the Order dated 30th January 2024, passed by the learned Designated Judge in Miscellaneous Application No. 1520 of 2022, in MPID Case No. 7 of 2016.

2) Mr. Kadam, learned senior counsel appears for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Smt. Shinde, learned APP, appears for Respondent Nos.4 and 6, and learned Advocate Mr. Patil, appears for Respondent No.5. 1/2

DTG 42--ii-Ia-1912-2024.doc 3) Perusal of Application indicates that, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay.

4) In view thereof and for the reasons stated in the Application, delay is condoned and Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). ( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 2/2