Yasmeen Bano Shah v. Faisal Fateh Mohammed Shah

905 IA 2320.24 IN REVNST 11742.24.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2320 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO.11742 OF 2024 Yasmeen Bano Shah ...Applicant

Versus

Faisal Fateh Mohammed Shah & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Shreyash Sudhir Butala, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Satyaram R. Gaud, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Ganesh Gupta a/w Mr. Sahil Ghorpade, Mr. Madan Khansole and Surya Gupta i/by GG Legal Associates for Respondent No.2.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :

5th March 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant and the Respondents.

2.

The Interim Application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 95 days in filing the Criminal Revision Application. 3.

Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have strongly opposed the Application by filing Affidavit-in-Reply. Both the learned Counsel appearing for both the Respondents state that no documents have Dusane

905 IA 2320.24 IN REVNST 11742.24.DOC been produced on record to support the reasons for condonation of delay.

4.

However, it is required to be noted that the delay is only of 95 days. The ground raised are that although the learned Advocate has been approached for filing the Criminal Revision Application, he has not taken any prompt steps. It is also mentioned that due to financial constraints, the Criminal Revision Application could not be filed earlier.

5.

Accordingly, for the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) with no order as to costs.

6.

Place the Criminal Revision Application on board for admission on 19th March 2025.

7.

Respondents are at liberty to file Affidavit-in-Reply. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) Dusane