← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/2559/2024disposed off as withdrawn

Farooq Illiyas Motorwala v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

2024-07-15Hon'Ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale , Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere2 pages

Digitally signed by RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL Date:

2024.07.16 16:25:53 +0530 RUSHIKESH VISHNU PATIL 1/2 26 WP.1527.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1527 OF 2019 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2559 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1527 OF 2019 Farooq Illiyas Motorwala .. Petitioner/Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

.. Respondents ...

Mr. N. N. Gawankar a/w Mr. Manas N. Gawankar a/w Mr. Shreyas N. Gawankar, for the petitioner/Applicant. Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, APP, for the State.

Ms Suvarna Chorge, Jailor Group - II, Nashik Jail, is present. ...

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED : 15th JULY, 2024 P.C:- 1.

Mr. Gawankar has invited our attention to an order passed by the Division Bench of this Court dated 08.03.2019 in case of Yogesh Daulat Gadakh V/s. The State of Maharashtra alongwith the two other connected Writ Petitions, where, by taking note of the decision of the Apex Court in case of Asfaq V/s State of Rajasthan and Ors.1, where the parameters and purpose of releasing a convict on Prole and Furlough has been reiterated, and the issue as to whether Parole or Furlough can (2017) 15 SCC 55 R.V.Patil

2/2 26 WP.1527.2019.odt be refused to a convict who is convicted for committing a serious or heinous crime (such as for terrorism), is specifcally discussed. It is in the wake of this decision, the Division Bench has formulated the following issues for consideration and requested it to be placed before the Hon'ble the Chief Justice for passing of an order on the Administrative Side: "(I) Whether the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sharad Devaram Shelake (supra) can be said to be correct and can be read as binding precedent in the light of the subsequent decision of the Apex Court in the case of Asfaq (supra)?

(II) Whether Sub-Rule 13 of Rule 4 which was introduced by the amendments made in the years 2012, 2016 and 2018 is violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India?"

Let the Registry appraise us about the development in this regard.

List on 24.07.2024 under the caption "For Directions". (MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) R.V.Patil