Prakash Manohar Sharma v. State Of Maharashtra

24(i)-IA-2595-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2595 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2024 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2024.07.31 19:50:26 +0530 Prakash Manohar Sharma ...Applicant In the matter between:- The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant vs.

Uday Shardaprasad Pathak and Ors.

...Respondents

***** Mr.H.J.Dedhia:- APP for Applicant No.1-State.

Mr.Prashant G. Pandey a/w Mr.Dinesh Jadhwani i/b. W Three Legal LLP:- Advocate for Respondent No.1.

Mr.Narayan Rokade a/w Mr.Abhang Suryawanshi:- Advocate for Applicant in Interim Application and for Respondent No.14 in Revision Application.

Mr.Vishal Mohite - API:- DCB - CID - Unit 12 - Mumbai.

***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

16th JULY 2024 P. C. :- 1.

This is an Application for intervention by Respondent No.14 as per the Revision Application. The Court of Additional Sessions Judge Satish Sangar 1/2

24(i)-IA-2595-2024.doc - Greater Mumbai stayed the trial of the Sessions Case No.717 of 2011 till the conclusion of the MCOC Special Case No.576 of 2020. It is on the basis of an Application filed by the Accused No.1. The State is aggrieved. That is why, this Revision Application. 2.

The Respondent No.14 claims that he is also aggrieved by the said order because he is an 'undertrial prisoner'. His Intervention Application is allowed.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2