Akash Siddharth Ingle v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

32-IA-3237-24 IN APEAL-949-24.doc S.S.Kilaje

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3237 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.949 OF 2024 Akash Siddharth Ingle .... Applicant V/s.

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.... Respondents ---- Ms. Anjali Patil a/w. Tohid Shaikh and Ms. Riddhi Kothalikar, Advocates for the Applicant.

Mr. Ashok Gawai, APP for the Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Chetan Alai, Appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. ---- CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 10th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C:- 1.

Learned counsel for both the sides are heard. 2.

When this Court has shown disinclination to suspend the sentence and enlarge the appellant on bail, learned counsel for the applicant on instructions, does not press the application. She seeks liberty to move fresh application for suspension of sentence in case appeal is not heard in a period of a year. 3.

Liberty is granted.

4.

Application stands disposed off as not pressed. by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2025.11.11 12:04:18 +0700 SONALI SATISH KILAJE (R.M. JOSHI, J.)