← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/3580/2024disposed off

Sarita Prashant Boorugu v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2024-09-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'Ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande2 pages

1/2 903-Ia-3580-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3580 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.18717 OF 2024 Sarita Prashant Boorugu ..

Applicant

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.

..

Respondents ...

Mr. Subodh Desai, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Anuj Jhaveri, Mr. Aditya Sawant, Mr. Mihir Modi i/b Mr. Anuj Jhaveri, for the Applicant.

Ms. Rebecca Gonsalvez, Special P.P. a/w Mr. S. V. Gavand, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

Mr. Arvind Lakhawat a/w Mr. Nimeet Sharma, Mr. Jalpa Shah i/b MZM Legal LLP, for the Respondent No.3.

Mr. Mahadeo Kirwale, Deputy Collector and Competent Authority (NSEL), is present.

Mr. Manoj Kadam, PSI, EOW, Mumabi, is present. ...

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED : 5th SEPTEMBER, 2024 P.C:- 1.

The present Interim Application filed in the Appeal, challenging the order dated 19.04.2023, passed below Exh-129 in Special MPID Case No.1 of 2014, there is a delay of 1 year and 66 days.

Chaitanya

2/2 903-Ia-3580-2024.doc 2.

We have heard the learned senior counsel Mr. Desai for the Applicant and when we perused the Application, the challenge is that, the impugned order passed is in violation of principles of natural justice and the Applicant was not aware about the passing of the said impugned order and only upon gaining the knowledge, the Appeal has been filed by the Appellant.

We are satisfied with the bonafides of the delay, as a result, the Interim Application is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE,J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Chaitanya