Leeladhar Aithu Bangera v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

47 Ia-1891-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1891 OF 2024 ALONGWITH IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 288 OF 2021 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3796 OF 2024 IN INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1891 OF 2024 Leeladhar Aithu Bangera ...Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

***** Mr. Leeladhar Bangera Applicant in-person Mr. C. D. Mali APP for the Respondent-State Mr. Shreeram Shirsat, Spl.

PP a/w Nikhil Daga a/w Karishma Rajesh a/w Antara Kulkarni Advocate for CBI-Respondent No. 2 ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

16th JUNE 2025 P. C. :- INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3796 OF 2024 1.

Heard the Applicant-convicted accused in-person and learned by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2025.06.20 16:09:00 +0530 Seema 1/2 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR

47 Ia-1891-2024.doc Advocate Shri Shirsat for CBI.

2.

By way of Interim Application No. 1891 of 2024, the ApplicantAppellant has prayed for de-freezing certain assets. However, while drafting the said application, one prayer for relieving him from attending trial court remain to be incorporated. That is why present two interim applications.

3.

Considering the nature of the prayer, the Interim Application No. 3796 of 2024 is allowed. The Applicant is permitted to carry out the amendment and to serve amended copy on the other side. 4.

While staying the execution and operation of order of the recovery, this Court has considered the affidavit filed by the Applicant, that is why the order is stayed. Learned Advocate Shri Shirsat sought time to take instructions as to whether the assets in respect of which prayer for de-freezing is sought is part of the disproportionate asset or not.

5.

Matter be kept on 07th July 2025.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2