Dnyaneshwar @ Mauli Appaso Shelke v. State Of Maharashtra

1 of 2 948.IA.4004.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4004 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2881 OF 2024 Dnyaneshwar @ Mauli Appaso Shelke Appellant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Mr.Amit Icham, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr.P.P.Deokar, APP, for State.

CORAM :

ANIL S.KILOR, J.

DATE :

16th October 2024 PC :

1.

Learned counsel for Applicant seeks modification of Bail Order dated 16th July 2024 on the ground that there is no one to look after his family at Kangaon, District Pune.

2.

Sufficient period has lapsed after the order granting bail is passed i.e. 16th July 2004. Considering further fact that while granting bail to the co-accused, similar condition was not imposed, thus, I am of the opinion that application needs to be allowed. 3.

Accordingly the condition number (b) imposed while granting bail vide order dated 16th July 2024 in Criminal Bail application No.2881 of 2024 to the effect that the Applicant not to enter into Pune District is hereby relaxed.

MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Date: 2024.10.17 16:55:20 +0530 MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE 4.

The Applicant shall attend Yavat Police Station, Taluka Daund, District Pune where the FIR was originally registered, on every

2 of 2 948.IA.4004.2024.doc Sunday between 11.00 a.m and 01.00 p.m till conclusion of trial, except on the date of trial. All other conditions imposed in order dated 16th July 2024 shall remain in force.

5.

Interim Application stands disposed off.

(ANIL S.KILOR, J.) MST