Kaluram Pandharinath Chaudhari v. State Of Maharashtra

by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date:

2025.06.26 10:21:12 +0530 ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR 35.IA4337.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IINTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4337 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3413 OF 2024 Kaluram Pandharinath Chaudhari ... Applicant.

In the matter between Mahesh Laxman Bhosale.

... Applicant.

Vs.

State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

**** Mr. Priyal G. Sarda, a/w. Mr. Shubham S. Sane, Advocate for Intervenor.

Mr. Harshwardhan Karande i/b. Jha Legal Associates, Advocate for the Applicant in BA/3413/2024 & BA/680/2025.

Ms. Manisha Devkar, Advocate for Applicant in BA/324/2025. Ms. Shubhangi Parulekar, Advocate for Applicant in BA/3695/2024. Mr. T.G. Khan, APP for Respondent/State in BA/3413/2024 & BA/3695/2024.

Mr. Vinod Chate, APP for Respondent/State in BA/324/2025 & BA/680/2025.

API Prerna Kulkarni, EOW, Pune City.

**** CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

24 JUNE, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Sarda, learned Advocate for the intervenor, Mr. Harshwardhan, learned Advocate for Applicant in Bail Application and Mr. Khan, learned APP for State.

Talwalkar

35.IA4337.2024.odt 2.

By the present Application, Intervenor has sought following prayer:

"b. The Intervener may be allowed to intervene in the 3 present Criminal Bail Application and to bring the correct facts before this Hon'ble Court and accordingly the hearing may be given to the Intervener."

3.

Learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application does not object to this Application for intervention by the Informant/Complainant.

4.

In view of the above, considering that the Intervenor is the first Informant/Complainant on the basis of whose intervention, Crime is registered. Intervenor is permitted to intervene in the Bail Application No. 3413 of 2024.

5.

Interim Application No. 4337 of 2024 is allowed in the above said terms.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Talwalkar