Laxman Janaku Vayal v. The State Of Maharashtra

910-IA-4526-2024 .doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4526 OF 2024 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1268 OF 2024 Laxman Janaku Vayal ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

....

Ms. Savvy Kolhekar i/by Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer G. Khan, A.P.P. for the Respondent - State. Mr. Sachin Chaudhari (A.P.I.), Crime Branch Nasik, present. ....

CORAM

:

N. R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

16th JANUARY, 2025.

P.C.

:

1.

This Court by order dated 24.04.2024 while releasing the applicant on bail has imposed the following condition. "(b) The Applicant shall not enter Taluka Ambegaon, District-Pune after being released on bail, except for reporting to the Investigating Officer, if called, and for attending the trial"

2.

The learned A.P.P. has drawn my attention to the Paragraph No.9 of the said order which reads thus: Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2025.01.16 18:33:06 +0530 SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Sajakali Jamadar

910-IA-4526-2024 .doc 9.

Mr. Vagal, learned Counsel for the Applicant states that as several witnesses are residing in the same locality as that of the Applicant, the Applicant will therefore not reside within Taluka Ambegaon, District-Pune and that the Applicant will reside at the house of Bharat Janaku Vayal, At Post-Narayangaon, Taluka-Junnar, District-Pune.

3.

In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant before this Court, I am not inclined to entertain the present application. The application is rejected.

(N. R. BORKAR, J.) Sajakali Jamadar