Dipak Shantaram Chavan v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

KVM 1/2 8 - IA 4652 OF 2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:

2025.02.07 14:42:40 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4652 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3026 OF 2024 Dipak Shantaram Chavan ..... Applicant/ Org. Complainant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Ratnesh Chaudhari ..... Applicant

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent Mr.Siddharth Jha a/w. Mr. Ashish Saxena i/b. Law Global for the Applicant.

Ms. Supriya Kak, A.P.P. for the State.

Mr.Sagar Talekar for the Applicant in the IA. WPSI Poonam Bapu Ruge, Sakinaka Police Station is present. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 6th FEBRUARY, 2025 P.C. :- 1.

Heard. The applicant/accused does not oppose this interim application.

KVM 2/2 8 - IA 4652 OF 2024.doc 2.

In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jagjeet Singh & Ors. vs. Ashish Mishra @Monu & Anr., in Criminal Appeal No. 632 of 2022, it is held that a victim is entitled to be heard during adjudication of bail application of the accused.

2.

In view of the same, the interim application is allowed. 3.

Amendment to be carried out forthwith. The amended copy of the anticipatory bail application be served on the other side.

4.

In view of the above, this interim application is disposed of. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]