Prashant Kantilal Jain v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Mamta Kale 20-aba-3236-2024.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3236 of 2024 Sachin Suresh Dhuri ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent with Interim Application No. 5005 of 2024 in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3236 of 2024 Prashant Kantilal Jain ... Applicant / Intervenor In the matter between Sachin Suresh Dhuri ... Applicant versus Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:

2024.12.10 16:40:08 +0530 MAMTA AMAR KALE The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ---- Mr S R Samel i/b Rajeev Sawant & Associates, for the applicant.

Ms Supriya Kak, APP, for the respondent/ State. Mr Sharad Bhosale a/w Mr Swapnil Pednekar, for the intervenor.

PSI Sanjay Bore, Pairavi, Malad Police Station, Mumbai, is present.

---- Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.

Date: 10 December 2024.

__________________________________________________ 10 December 2024

Mamta Kale 20-aba-3236-2024.docx P.C.:

Interim Application No. 5005 of 2024 .

For the reasons stated in the application and the no objection from the other side, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

2.

The intervention application stands disposed of accordingly.

Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3236 of 2024 .

Heard.

2.

The applicant to implead the intervenor as a party respondent to this application. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

3.

At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, stand over to 19 December 2024.

(R.N. Laddha, J.) __________________________________________________ 10 December 2024