← Library
Bombay High CourtCOMAO/3/2025disposed off

Messers Kalyani Corporation Thr. Its Prop. Kalyani Vivek Sonar v. M/S. Nina Sales Corporation Thr. Ketan Praful Shah

2025-04-02Hon'Ble The Chief Justice , Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik2 pages

27-COMAO.3.2025.doc Jvs.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1777 OF 2025 JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Messers Kalyani Corporation } Appellant versus M/s. Nina Sales Corporation } Respondent JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date: 2025.04.03 01:29:21 +0530 Mr. Vaibhav Ghogre with Mr. Sarvesh Gawade i/b. Mr. Suraj Ghogare for appellant.

Mr. Pradip Nair i/b. Mr. Vijay Svaghela for respondent.

CORAM:

ALOK ARADHE, CJ. & M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE:

APRIL 2, 2025 ORDER: (Per Chief Justice) 1.

This appeal under section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 has been filed against an order dated 23rd October 2023, by which, the notice of motion seeking setting aside the ex-parte decree has been rejected on the ground that the appellant has failed to show any sufficient cause for setting aside the ex-parte decree.

2.

Facts giving rise to filing of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the respondent had filed a suit for recovery of an amount of Rs.3,55,000/- along with interest. A summons was issued to the appellant on its business address, which was

27-COMAO.3.2025.doc returned un-served with the postal remark "left". The plaintiff, thereafter, from the GST record of the defendant, found out the residential address of the proprietor of the defendant firm and a fresh summons was issued, which was served on 2nd July 2022 on the appellant requiring her to appear before the Court on 8th August 2022. The appellant did not appear before the Court on 8th August 2022, whereupon, the Court proceeded ex-parte against the appellant and passed the ex-parte judgement and decree dated 19th September 2022.

3.

The appellant filed application on 21st December 2022 seeking setting aside of the ex-parte judgement and decree, which has been rejected by the impugned order. 4.

In our opinion, the dispute between the parties can be settled through mediation. Hence, we appoint Mr.Nitin Thakker, learned senior counsel as Mediator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

5.

The parties undertake to appear before the learned Mediator through Video Conferencing or in-person on 8th April 2024 along with a copy of this order.

6.

List on 22nd April 2025.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)