← Library
Bombay High CourtEP/9/2024disposed off as withdrawn

Bhausaheb Vitthal Bhogode v. Kishore Bhikaji Darade

2025-03-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

35.EP.9.24.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY O.O.C.J.

O.O.C.J.

ELECTION PETITION NO. 9 OF 2024 Bhausaheb Vitthal Bhogode .. Petitioner

Versus

Kishore Bhikaji Darade and Ors.

.. Respondents WITH APPLICATION (L.) NO. 4348 OF 2025 IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 9 OF 2024 Kishore Bhikaji Darade .. Applicant

IN THE MATTER OF:

Bhausaheb Vitthal Bhogode .. Petitioner

Versus

Kishore Bhikaji Darade and Ors.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Pranjal Agarwal a/w. Dixita Gohil and Rounak Burad, Advocates for Petitioner.

 Mr. Chirag Shah a/w. Ms. Savita Suryawanshi, Mr. Shyamsunder Jadhav and Ms. Kavita Dhanuka, Advocate for Respondent No.1 and Applicant in Application (L.) No.4348 of 2025.  Mr. Mayuresh Lagu, Advocate for Respondent No.5 - Union of India.

....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : MARCH 03, 2025.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Agarwal, learned Advocate for Applicant; Mr. Shah, learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 and Applicant in Application (L.) No.4348 of 2025 and Mr. Lagu, learned Advocate for Respondent No.5 - Union of India.

35.EP.9.24.doc 2.

Private Respondents have filed Application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Mr. Lagu, learned Advocate appears on behalf of Respondent No.5 - Union of India. 3.

Mr. Agarwal, learned Advocate for Applicant prays for time to file Affidavit-in-Reply to the Application under Order VII Rule 11. Let the Affidavit-in-Reply be filed within a period of four weeks from today. Rejoinder, if any, shall be filed within two weeks thereafter. 4.

Stand over to 22nd April, 2025.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.03.03 20:03:12 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE