Veeramaneni Venugopalrao v. Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd

ARBP-166-2025.doc (nob-2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 166 OF 2025 [No papers] Veeramaneni Venugopalrao

...Petitioner

Versus

Mahindra and Mahindra Limited

...Respondent

------ Mr. R. V. Govilkar, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Shaba N. Khan i/b Mr. Iqbal Siddiqui for Petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Patole i/b Khandeparkar Law Office for Respondent. ------ CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : MARCH 27, 2026 P. C. :

1.

Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for Petitioner would submit that inadvertently during the hearing of Arbitration Petition, it was not pointed out that addressee to whom the impugned Award was forwarded was not the Respondent in the Arbitration. 3.

As the judgment has been reserved in the matter and submission was canvassed subsequent thereto, notice was given to the Respondent who is being represented. Learned counsel for Respondent would submit that the documents on which the Petitioner is making submission was already pointed out to this Court. Hence, the submission is recorded.

[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] Sairaj 1 of