Mahendra Ramniklal Shah v. M/S Gangar Infrastructure

52.ARBP.353.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.353 OF 2024 Mahendra Ramniklal Shah ....Petitioner

Versus

M/s Gangar Infrastructure ....Respondent Ms. Henna Shah, Advocate for Petitioner.

CORAM: SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 15, 2025 ORDER :

1.

Despite multiple Orders dated March 13, 2025, May 2, 2025 and October 6, 2025, the Respondent has not executed the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement ("PAAA"). In these circumstances, a prima facie case has been made out for suo moto taking up proceedings for contempt.

2.

It is seen that by an Order dated May 2, 2025, the Respondent had instructed its Advocates to commit to execute the PAAA and that the appointment in the Registrar Office be taken accordingly. 3.

The Registry shall issue notice to the Respondent as to why appropriate action for contempt should not be taken. The partners of Digitally signed by AARTI GAJANAN PALKAR Date:

2025.10.27 13:50:30 +0530 AARTI GAJANAN PALKAR OCTOBER 15, 2025 Aarti Palkar

52.ARBP.353.2024.doc Respondent are directed to remain present on the next date. In their absence, a non-bailable warrant would be issued to secure their presence.

4.

Registry shall also serve a copy of this order on the Respondent within a week from its upload on the website. 5.

Stand over to November 17, 2025.

6.

All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court's website.

[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] OCTOBER 15, 2025 Aarti Palkar