Harshad Chandrashekhar Kurve v. Grievance Redressal Committee, Mummbai Suburban

28-29. WP 343-346.2025 Harshad Kurve vs. GRC Chandrashekhar Kurve vs. GRC by JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR Date:

2026.01.16 19:33:19 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 343 OF 2025 Harshad Chandrashekhar Kurve ... Petitioner V/s.

Grievance Redressal Committee, Mumbai & Ors.

... Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 346 OF 2025 Chandrashekhar Sakharam Kurve ... Petitioner V/s.

Grievance Redressal Committee, Mumbai & Ors.

... Respondents _______________________________________ Mr. Navin Singh for the Petitioner Mr. Prashant Kamble, AGP for Respondent - State in WP 343/2025 Ms. Madhura Deshmukh, AGP for Respondent - State in WP 346/2025 Ms. Aarushi Yadav with Prakhar Tandon i/b. Ravleen Sabharwal for Respondent No.3 - SRA in both Petitions _______________________________________ CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.

DATE : 14TH JANUARY 2026 P.C. :

1.

These Writ Petitions have been filed by the Petitioners who are son and father respectively, impugning an order passed by the Grievance Redressal Committee which has rejected their eligibility. ------------------------------------- Order dated 14th January 2026

28-29. WP 343-346.2025 Harshad Kurve vs. GRC Chandrashekhar Kurve vs. GRC 2.

Considering that, the learned Counsel who appears on behalf of the Respondent - SRA is directed to examine whether her clients can consider one rehabilitation allotment, either residential or commercial, between the said son and father and revert on the next occasion. 3.

Stand over to 27th January 2026.

4.

In the meantime, all the Respondents shall file their Affidavit-inReply on or before the next date. ( FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. ) Jyoti Pawar ------------------------------------- Order dated 14th January 2026