Kaushik Mulraj Asher v. The State Of Maharashtra

Laxmi 9 WP 3497-24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3497 OF 2024 Kaushik Mulraj Asher ... Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents Mr. I. K. Tripathi a/w Akash Jaiswar for the Petitioner. Ms. Prachi Tatake, Add.GP a/w Vrushali Kabre, AGP for the RespondentState. Ms. Sneha Prabhu for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6.

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ.

DATE : 17th April, 2025.

P.C.:- 1) Mr. Tripathi, the learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner, on instructions, submitted that out of the three premises claimed by the Petitioner, two Permanent Alternate Accommodations have already been allotted by MHADA to him. That the MHADA Authorities have assured the Petitioner that they will also allot the third Permanent Alternate Accommodation premises to him as per the provisions of law. 2.

In view thereof, the Petition is worked out and the grievance of the Petitioner as of today does not survive. The Petition is accordingly disposed off.

(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1