Rrajesh V. Baahl v. Versova View Chs Ltd.

34 WP-3565-2024 (OS).doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date:

2025.04.07 19:33:19 +0530 HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF WRIT PETITION NO. 3565 OF 2024 Rrajesh V. Baahl & Ors.

..Petitioners Vs.

Versova View CHS Ltd. & Ors.

..Respondents *** Mr. Yatin R. Shah, Advocate for Petitioners.

Mr. Abhishek Sawant a/w. Mr. Chirag Gupta i/b. Solicis JVPD, for Respondent No.1.

Mr. Vishal Khanavkar, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent No.2 to 5 - State.

*** CORAM: A.S. CHANDURKAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

DATE : 7TH APRIL 2025 P.C. :

1.

The Petitioners have approached this Court with a grievance that the various directions issued by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies - Respondent No.2 on 09.02.2024 in the matter of management of the Respondent No.1 - Society, are not being complied with. According to the Petitioners, by the aforesaid order, various directions came to be issued to the Respondent No.1 - Society with regard to its management.

2.

We find that after these directions issued on 09.02.2024, the Petitioners have not approached the Respondent No.2 to bring to its notice the nature of the non-compliance as alleged. It would be necessary to the Petitioners to first approach the Respondent No.2 in that regard.

Husen 1/2

34 WP-3565-2024 (OS).doc 3.

In that view of the matter, the Petitioners are at liberty to move Respondent No.2 with a grievance about alleged non compliance of the directions issued on 09.02.2024. If such a grievance is raised, Respondent No.2 shall consider the same in accordance with law and after giving opportunity to all concerned parties. 4.

It is clarified that this Court has not examined the merits of the rival parties. All issues are kept open.

5.

The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) Husen 2/2