Dhanishankar Budhiram Jaiswar v. The State Of Maharashtra

3.wp.4009.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4009 OF 2024 Dhanishankar Budhiram Jaiswar .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents Mr. Amit G. Dubey i/b Ashok M. Saraogi, Advocates for the Petitioner.

Mr.Prashant Kamble, AGP for State/Respondent No.1. Ms. Heena Shaikh i/b M.V. Kini & Co., Advocates for Respondent No.2.

Digitally signed by UTKARSH KAKASAHEB BHALERAO Date:

2025.09.12 10:55:00 +0530 UTKARSH KAKASAHEB BHALERAO

CORAM

: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FARHAN P. DUBASH, JJ.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 P. C.

1.

After this Writ Petition was argued for some time, and we were not inclined to entertain it, the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the above Writ Petition. He, however, sought liberty to make a fresh representation to the BEST for the purposes of the electricity connection to his premises. SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 Utkarsh

3.wp.4009.2024.doc 2.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the above Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

3.

The Petitioner is free to make a fresh representation to the BEST for a electricity connection to his premises. If any such representation is made, the BEST shall consider the same especially keeping in mind the order passed by the Small Causes Court at Mumbai below Exhibit-107 in R.A.D. Suit No.2505 of 2006 dated 23rd August 2014.

4.

Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by [FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 Utkarsh