Maharashtra Navanirman Kamagar Sena v. The Employees Provident Fund Organization

JPP

12. WP 4116.24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4116 OF 2024 Maharashtra Navanirman Kamgar Sena ... Petitioner V/s.

The Employees Provident Fund Organization & Ors.

... Respondents Mr. Dishang Shah i/b. Vinod Shetty for the Petitioner Ms. Shehnaz V. Bharucha for Respondent Nos. 1,2 and 3 CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

DATE : 05 SEPTEMBER 2024 P.C. :- Principal grievance of the Petitioner is that the Central Government Industrial Tribunal is not functioning at Mumbai. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel for the Provident Fund Organization inform that earlier, in a Petition raising similar grievance after hearing the learned Additional Solicitor General, certain directions have been issued by this Court. The situation has not improved.

2.

The Petitioner will give notice to Respondent No.5 and file affidavit of service.

JPP

12. WP 4116.24.doc 3.

List the Petition on 1 October 2024 under the caption "For Directions".

4.

In this matter assistance of the learned Additional Solicitor General is required, as he has rendered earlier, when similar grievance was made. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 - Provident Fund Organization states that this order would be conveyed to the learned Additional Solicitor General. M.M. SATHAYE, J.

NITIN JAMDAR, J.

by JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR Date:

2024.09.06 11:28:20 +0530 JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR