Ahmed Abdul Rahman Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

JPP 11. WP 4119.24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4119 OF 2024 Ahmed Abdul Rahman Shaikh ... Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

... Respondents ___________________________________ Mr. A.A. Siddiquie with Mr. Chowdhari Moinuddin i/b. A.A. Siddiquie & Associates for Petitioner.

Ms. S.V. Tondwalkar i/b. Komal Punjabi for Respondent No. 2 - BMC. Mr. Vishwanath Patil with Mr. Akshay Naidu for Respondent No.4 Ms. Sheetal Ulhas Malvankar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1 -State. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ.

DATE : 29th November 2024.

P.C. :

1) Though the Respondent No. 2 - BMC is willing to allot necessary tenement/s to the Petitioner which as per the photographs annexed to the documents produced on record, are humanly habitable in condition, the Petitioner's demands are much more. The said demands cannot be adjudicated at the stage of admission.

2) Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2.1) Admit.

3) According to us, grant of interim relief would amount to allowing Petition at the stage of admission itself hence, interim relief rejected.

( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 1/1 JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR by JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR Date: 2024.12.04 12:30:46 +0530