← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4917/2024disposed off

Dhanera Diamonds v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 19, Mumbai

2025-02-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain , Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak3 pages

by LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN Date:

2025.02.25 17:47:10 +0530 LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN lgc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 342 OF 2025 Sunny Arvindbhai Shah : Petitioner

Versus

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-19 Mumbai : Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1073 OF 2025 Ranchood Kanjibhai Detroja : Petitioner

Versus

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-17 Mumbai : Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4917 OF 2024 Dhanera Diamonds : Petitioner

Versus

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-19 Mumbai : Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (l) NO. 20644 OF 2024 Mahesh Ranchhod Detroja : Petitioner

Versus

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-19 Mumbai : Respondent

WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 20580 OF 2024 Arvindbhai Jayantilal Shah : Petitioner

Versus

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-19 Mumbai : Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4981 OF 2024 Ratnakala Exports Private Limited : Petitioner

Versus

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-5 Mumbai : Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5459 OF 2024 Dhanera Diamonds India Pvt. Ltd.

: Petitioner

Versus

Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-6 Mumbai : Respondent ______________________________________________________ Mr Ravi Sawana a/w Ms Neha Sharma, i/by Sriram Sridharan for the Petitioners in all Petitions.

Mr Akhileshwar Sharma, for the Respondent-Revenue in all Petitions except Writ Petition No.4981 of 2024. Mr. Vikas T Khanchandani for the Respondent-Revenue in Writ Petition No.4981 of 2024..

______________________________________________________

CORAM

M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.

DATED:

25 February 2025

PC:- 1.

Mr. Ravi Sawana, the learned counsel for the Petitioners in each of these matters, based on instructions from the Petitioners, seeks leave to withdraw these Petitions. 2.

Accordingly, leave is granted.

3.

These Petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. (Jitendra Jain, J) (M.S. Sonak, J)