Alice Philipose W/O P T Philipose v. P T Philipose (Deceased)

Before: Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date: 15th July, 2025 FOR COMPLIANCE:

112. TP/483/2025 (AMH20230054075C 202400008) with WILL/198/2025 P.C.

:

Shri. Swapnil Narakar i/b IYER PARVATHY KAOSHIK Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner 1) This petition is filed by petitioner, being sole beneficiary under the Will executed by P. T. Philipose (herein after the same is referred to as "Testator"), for grant of a Letters of Admin istration with Will annexed. Said Testator said to have died at Mumbai on 05.09.2017. Petitioner, namely ALICE PHILIPOSE W /o P. T. PHILIPOSE, filed the copy of death certificate, identity proof of the testator, Will, petitioner's oath.

2) Perused petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. Perused documents.

3) The petitioner has explained the delay vide Rule 382 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rule, 1980(for short "Rules").

4) No executor has been appointed under the Will. The petitioner is the legatee under the Will. Hence, petition is tenable.

5) Petitioner stated that the deceased left behind his last Will and Testament which was duly executed at Mumbai on 03.08.2016, in English language. The Will is handed in separately for being filed and kept in a safe place in the Office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay.

6) Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that testator is survived by legal heirs, whose details are given in the petition, as per the provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925. The petitioner affirmed that there are no other legal heirs of the deceased, except mentioned in the petition. Legal heir of the testator, namely Aby Philipose, has consented to the petition and thereby waived the

service of Citation.

7) Citation to non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased, namely ANNIE BINU KURIAN (nee ANNIE PHILIPOSE), was issued, which is duly served upon her by sheriff as per BHC Rules, on 29.04.2025. However, non-consenting legal heir did not resist the petition.

8) Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon'ble High Court and notice board of the Collector's Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short "BHC Rules") and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

9) The petitioner has filed the affidavit of A. I. Lobo (AgneloIsmael Lobo) s/o. lsmael Lobo & Usha Viswanathan wife of Vishwanathan K. S. attesting Witnesses to the Will, in form No.102 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. They deposed that deceased signed the Testament in their presence, after going through its contents. Hence, enough evidence is on record to accept the execution of the Will and petitioner is succeeded to prove the execution of Will.

10) Properties mentioned in the schedule-I of the petition are referred in the Will.

11) Petitioner has executed the administration Bond in the prescribed format. Hence, following order:

ORDER

1) Petition is granted.

2) Office to issue Letters of Administration with Will annexed to the petitioner, as per the Rules, having effect throughout the

State of Maharashtra.

3) Before issuance of Letters of Administration with Will, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat is filed. Office to act accordingly.

15th July, 2025 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department