← Library
Bombay High CourtTP/1504/2024grant issued

Conrad Daniel And Others v. Juliat Arick Daniel (Deceased)

2024-08-28Mrs.Shonali K Dighe, Commissioner For Taking Accounts2 pages

1 37.TP/1504/2024 Before :Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date 28th August, 2024 FOR COMPLIANCE:

37. TP/1504/2024 P. C.

:

Shri. Vishal Patil Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner [Original] (ECHCBM0200333 2024)

1) This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration, under the Provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short "IS Act") for the properties left by the deceased, namely Juliat Arick Daniel (For short "Said deceased"). The petitioners, namely (1) Conrad Daniel, (2) Priya Umesh Sharma and (3) Mayrose Anthony Joseph, have filed documents.

2) I have heard Ld. Advocate. I perused the documents, such as true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, affidavit with document to dispense with requisition of identity proof of the deceased, oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation. Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that he has uploaded affidavit of service online having document no.

AMH20230043076D202400009

3) Said deceased died as a Widow on 23-02-2022 at Mumbai leaving behind her legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioners state that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. Deceased left properties shown in the schedule.

4) Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon'ble High Court and notice board of the Collector's Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court(O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short "BHC Rules") and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one

2 37.TP/1504/2024 appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

5) In view of the Order, passed in the TP No. 2918/2023, the all legal heirs of the deceased are petitioners, and therefore they are exempted from the furnishing the surety Bond.

6) Ld. Advocate for the petitioners submitted that in view of provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, the petitioner, being No. 1 being son and No. 2 and 3 being daughters of the deceased, are entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by petitioners, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

ORDER

1) Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioners for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

2) The petitioners to file an account as under taken in a Petitioner's Oath within stipulated period.

3) Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

28th August, 2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department