← Library
Bombay High CourtTP/3175/2024grant issued

Ramesh Maneklal Gala v. Talakshi Servan Gala Deceased

2024-09-03C.J. Bhatt,Incharge Prothonotary And Sr Master2 pages

1 53.TP/3175/2024 Before :Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date FOR COMPLIANCE:

53. TP/3175/2024 P. C.

:

Shri. Ramesh Gupta Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner [Original] (ECHCBM0209309 2024)

1) This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration, under the Provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short "IS Act") for the properties left by the deceased, namely TALAKSHI SERVAN GALA (For short "Said deceased"). The petitioner, namely RAMESH MANEKLAL GALA, has filed documents.

2) I have heard Ld. Advocate. I perused the documents, such as true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, identity proof of the deceased, oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation. Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submitted he has uploaded administration bond online having document no. EDHCBM02504662024 and affidavit of service online having document no. EDHCBM02507272024.

3) Said deceased died as a Widower on 15/10/2012 at Mumbai leaving behind him legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. Deceased left properties shown in the schedule. The delay has been explained vide Rule 382 of the Rules.

4) Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the conspicuous part of the Hon'ble High Court and notice board of the Collector's Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court(O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short "BHC Rules") and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one

2 53.TP/3175/2024 appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

5) In view of order passed by the Hon'ble Court in TP Nos. 2556 & 2559 of 2022 dated 28.02.2023, and in view of order passed in TP/2918/2023, the petitioner, being the sole heir of the deceased, is exempted from furnishing the administrative bond.

6) Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the petitioner, being Nephew of the deceased, is entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by petitioner, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

ORDER

1) Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

2) The petitioner to file an account as under taken in a Petitioner's Oath within stipulated period.

3) Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department