← Library
Bombay High CourtTP/3209/2024grant issued

Valsala Madhavan Wd O Madhavan Namboodiri v. Veluthemana Cheerakuzhi Madhavan Namboodri (Deceased)

2024-10-21Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))3 pages

BEFORE : MR. DILIP S. GURAV, FIRST ASSISTANT MASTER Date: 21st October, 2024 CALLED FOR COMPLIANCE :

30 TP/3209/2024 ) Ms. Sangita Musle, Advocate for petitioner P.C.:

1. Perused Petition. Heard Ld. Advocate for petitioner. This petition is filed by petitioner, being sole legatee named under the Will executed by Veluthemana Cheerakuzhi Madhavan Namboodri (herein after the same is referred to as "Testator"), for grant of Letters of Administration with Will annexed. Testator said to have died on 23.01.2022 at Mumbai. Petitioner filed the copy of death certificate (which is annexed to petition as Exhibit-A), identity proof of the testator (which is annexed to petition as Exhibit- A1), Will, petitioner's oath, Affidavits of legal heirs of the testator.

2. The petitioner has filed petition within prescribed limit as per Rule 382 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rule, 1980 (for short "Rules").

3. The testator has not appointed Executor to execute the Will. The petitioner is being sole legatee named under the Will. Hence, petition is tenable.

4. Petitioner stated that the testator left behind his last Will and Testament which was duly executed at Mumbai on 11.08.2015, in English language. Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that the original Will No. 1299 of 2024 is handed in separately for being filed and kept in a safe place in the Office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay.

5. Petitioner states that parents of testator were predeceased to him and testator was survived by legal heirs shown in the paragraph No. 8 of the petition, as per the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Testator died leaving behind his widow Valsala Madhavan - petitioner herein and son namely Sudhir Madhavan and only daughter namely Sudha Mahesh Parmeshwaran. ......2

CONTD....

- 2 - TP/3209/2024 Consent Affidavits of Sudhir Madhavan and Sudha Mahesh Parmeshwaran both dated 19.03.2024 are on record. They have given their consents in the form of Affidavits, which are filed on the record by the petitioner and consented for the issuance of Letters of Administration with Will annexed in favour of the petitioner without justifying any surety in respect of their shares in the estate of the testator. They have waived the service of Citation. The petitioner affirmed that there are no other legal heirs of the testator other than mentioned in para No. 8 of the petition.

6. Affidavit of Service of General Citation is filed, stating that citation has been affixed on the Notice Board of the Hon'ble High Court, Bombay and notice board of the Collector's office on 30.09.2024. Notice to collector has been sent.

7. The petitioner has filed the Affidavit of Narain Murlidhar Bhojwani dated 20.03.2024, one of Attesting Witness to the Will, in the Form No.102 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. Attesting Witness deposed that he was present and testator signed on the Testament papers in presence of him and another witness. According to him, all additions and alteration, in a Will, were existed at the time of execution and before signing the Will. Hence, there is sufficient compliance of the Rule 383 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. Will is duly notarized before C. L. Sharma, Notary - Government of India under notary Sr. No. 1353 dated 11.08.2015. Attesting Witness further deposed that at the time of execution of the Will, testator was of sound and disposing mind, memory and understanding. Hence, enough evidence is on record to accept the execution of the Will and petitioner is succeeded to prove the execution of Will.

8. Properties mentioned in the schedule of the petition are referred in the Will as well as in residuals clause of the Will. Ld. Advocate for petitioner submits that as mentioned in para No. 6 of the petition, which reads as

CONTD....

under : ......3 TP/3209/2024 - 3 - "That the Petitioner has truly set forth in Schedule-I hereto annexed Exhibit - "C" all the properties and credits which the said deceased died possessed of or entitled to at the time of his death, which have or are likely to come to the Petitioner's hands. So far as the Petitioner has been able to ascertain or is aware that the said deceased left no other movable and immovable properties other than those specified in Schedule - I annexed hereto".

The Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that properties available to the testator at the time of his death are mentioned in the Schedule - I of the petition.

9. Petitioner has executed the Administration Bond dated 03.10.2024 in the prescribed format. Hence, following order:

ORDER

1) Petition is granted.

2) Office to issue Letters of Administration with Will annexed as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 to the petitioner and upon satisfaction that the administration Bond is properly executed, as per the Rules.

3) Before issuance of above said Letters of Administration with Will, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat is filed. Office to act accordingly.

21.10.2024 FIRST ASSISTANT MASTER