Iyer Karthik Virudhapuri Through Constituted Attorney Ajay B. Grang v. Virudhapuri Govindarajan (Deceased)

Before : Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date :- 18th November, 2024 FOR COMPLIANCE :

95. TP/4490/2024 [Original] (ECHCBM02108142024) P. C. :

Ms. Shruti Mishra i/b Grishma Lad Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner

1. Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner submitted that she has uploaded the administration bond. However, same is not showing on the portal. Furthermore, upon perusal of the physical copy of the Administration Bond, it appears that dates are not mentioned in the administration bond. Hence, petitioner to correct the same and re-upload the administration bond. Furthermore, corrections must be initialed by the petitioner, surety and notary.

2. Petitioner to comply issuance of Notice to Collector as per Rule 396 of the Bombay High Court (O. S.) Rules, 1980. Furthermore, petitioner to correct the title of the petition by following the Section 243 r/w Section 241 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. Hence, adjourned.

3. S. O. to 18.12.2024 18.11.2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department

4. Later on, Ld. Advocate for the petitioner moved a praecipe dated 18.11.2024 and thereby seeks permission to amend the petition correcting the title and prayer of the of the petition as per the praecipe. Submission is accepted. Praecipe is allowed. Consequential amendment, if any, stands allowed. Upon filing additional affidavit, the re-verification of the proposed amendment stands dispensed with.

5. Petitioner to carry out an amendment as well as consequential amendments within two weeks from the date of uploading of this order, if petition is pending. 18.11.2024 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department