← Library
Bombay High CourtMPT/57/2025disposed off

Rajendra Baliram Gholape v. Pramila Pravin Naik

2025-09-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

944.MPT.57.2025.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY & INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 57 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 21884 OF 2025 IN MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 57 OF 2025 Rajendra Baliram Gholape .. Petitioner Pramila Pravin Naik .. Respondent Sudarshan Sudam Sadaphule .. Intervenor ....................

 Mr. Prabhu Velar a/w. Ms. Bhakti Patil, Advocates for Petitioner.  Ms. Pramila Naik, Respondent in-person.

 Mr. Sudarshan Sadaphule, Intervenor in-person. ....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 20, 2025.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Velar, learned Advocate holding for Ms. Hunnurkar for Petitioner; Ms. Naik, Respondent in-person and Mr. Sadaphule, Intervenor in-person.

2.

Present Petition is filed for revocation of Grant. Executor is the Respondent who is present before the Court. Beneficiary under the Grant has filed Interim Application (L) No.21884 of 2025. Executor has filed Affidavit-in-Reply to oppose revocation of the Grant. Original Affidavit-in-Reply is handed over to the Court and the Court has taken a copy thereof and placed on record. Copy of Affidavit is given to Mr.

944.MPT.57.2025.doc Velar. He shall give the said copy to Ms. Hunnurkar. Executor has also filed brief notes of arguments.

3.

Interim Application for intervention filed by beneficiary namely Sudarshan Sadaphule is consider as a reply to the revocation Petition.

4.

Rejoinder, if any, is directed to be filed within one week from today and copy of the same shall be given to Respondent and the Intervenor by Ms. Hunnurkar.

5.

List the matter on Board on 26th September 2025. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.09.20 19:43:00 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE