Valli Ulaganathan W O Ulaganathan Ramalingam Pillai v. Ulaganathan Ramalingam Pillai Alias Ulaganathan Ramalingam (Deceased)

36-mpt-454-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.454 OF 2024 VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2024.10.21 18:18:03 +0530 Valli Ulaganathan ...

Petitioner vs.

Ulaganathan Ramalingam Pillai @ Ulaganathan Ramalingam ...

Deceased Mr. Ankit Rajput i/b. Mr. Rutvij Bhatt, for Petitioner.

CORAM:

N.J.JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

OCTOBER 21, 2024 P.C.

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2.

This petition is filed for grant of heirship certificate under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827.

3.

Ulaganathan Ramalingam Pillai (the deceased) was the husband of the Petitioner. The deceased passed away on 27th March, 2008. At the time of his death, the deceased had a fixed place of abode at 8, Rustic Ave, Hillsborough Auckland, New Zealand.

4.

The deceased died intestate, and despite diligent search, no testamentary writing or Will has been found. The deceased left behind the petitioner and two sons Ramalingam Ulaganathan and Palani Pillai, the details of whom are furnished at serial Nos. 2 and 3 in the table at paragraph 4. The parents of the deceased have predeceased him. There Vishal 1/2

36-mpt-454-2024.doc is no other legal heir.

5.

The petitioner and Ramalingam Ulaganathan and Palani Pillai, the sons of the deceased, appear to be the surviving class I legal heirs of the deceased. Ramalingam Ulaganathan and Palani Pillai have filed affidavits giving their consent for grant of heirship certificate. Thus, I do not find any impediment in granting heirship certificate. Hence, the following order :

ORDER

(i) The Petition stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (ii) Issue of proclamation is dispensed with.

(iii) Grant expedited.

( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) Vishal 2/2