Vitthal Chintaman Paradkar v. Reji Varghese S/O. P.J.Varghese

20.app.90.2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.90 OF 2024 IN MISC. TESTAMENTARY PETITION (L) NO.12845 OF 2021 Vitthal Chintaman Paradkar .. Appellant/ Org.Respondent No.1 UTKARSH KAKASAHEB BHALERAO

Versus

UTKARSH KAKASAHEB BHALERAO Date: 2025.12.12 12:03:50 +0530 Reji Varghese & Anr.

.. Respondents Ms. Amisha Lolusare i/b Aniesh Jadhav, Advocates for the Appellant.

Mr. Samji Joseph a/w Jins Thomas, Fionna Samji i/b Uni Lex, Advocates for Respondent No.1.

CORAM

: B. P. COLABAWALLA & AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 11, 2025 P. C.

1.

The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Appellant states that they are not getting any instructions from the Appellant and are therefore in the process of filing for a discharge. Considering these facts, the Registry is directed to issue notice to the Appellant returnable on 16th January 2026.

DECEMBER 11, 2025 Utkarsh

20.app.90.2024.doc 2.

We make it clear that if the Appellant does not appear on the next occasion despite service, we may proceed to dismiss the above Appeal for want of prosecution.

3.

Along with aforesaid notice, the Registry shall also forward a copy of this order to the Appellant.

4.

Stand over to 16th January 2026.

5.

Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by [AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] DECEMBER 11, 2025 Utkarsh