Rr Kabel Limited v. Union Of India
3-RPW.20.25.DOCX PPN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2025.10.14 11:37:54 +0530 PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR REVIEW PETITION NO.20 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 693 OF 2021 R.R. Kabel Limited ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors.
... Respondents ______________________________________________________ Mr. Prathusha Shah a/w Mr. Marmik Kandar i/by Khaitan & Co. for Petitioner.
Mr. Jitendra Mishra a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav for the Respondents.
_____________________________________________________ CORAM : M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.
DATED : 13 October 2025 PC. :- 1.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.
We are satisfied that no case is made out for review of our order dated 18 November 2024 made in Writ Petition No.693 of 2021. The review was attempted by absuing the facility of speaking to the minutes and even this attempt was rejected by us by our order dated 10 December 2024. 3.
The directions for payment of Rs.7,03,659/- together with interest were issued based upon a statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Now it is contended that such a statement was made on account of some miscommunication with the party and that the party claims that this amount was never payable or demanded.
3-RPW.20.25.DOCX 4.
At the highest, by way of indulgence, we can clarify that the payment of this amount shall be subject to final orders in Writ Petition No.693 of 2021 which is already admitted. We clarify our order dated 18 November 2024 to this extent. However, we are not inclined to grant relief to the petitioner from payment of any of the amounts referred to in our order dated 18 November 2024 by exercising our review jurisdiction. This is certainly not a case of any error apparent on the face of the record warranting the exercise of review jurisdiction.
5.
Therefore, with the above clarification, we dispose of this review petition.
6.
The time for depositing the amounts is now extended upto 30 November 2025. We note that the statement made on behalf of the petitioner was also one of the factors that persuaded us to issue Rule in this matter. Therefore, if the payments are not made, liberty to the respondents to apply pointing out the non-compliance. The petitioner should also file affidavit of compliance by serving copy on the learned counsel for the respondents by 12 December 2025. (Jitendra Jain, J) (M.S. Sonak, J)