Eknath Sitaram Chavan Through Chandrakant Eknath Chavan v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretry Houdinh And Area Development

5.CONPW.104.2024.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.104 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3113 OF 2015 1.Chandrakant Eknath Chavan,

2. Safiya Khatoon Mohammed Husain Inamdar Petitioners versus

1. The State of Maharashtra,

2. MHADA,

3. The CEO, MBR & R Board,

4. The Dy.Chief Engineer, City-III, MCGM,

5. ISA Enerprises Respondents _______ Mr.Asadullah Shaikh with Mr.Atif Pathan for Petitioner. Ms.Vaishali Choudhary, AGP, for State.

Mr.P.G.Lad with Ms.Sayli Apte, for Respondent MHADA. Ms.Pushpa Yadav for MCGM.

_______

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

DATE:

16th February 2026 P.C.

1.

Called out for Speaking to the Minutes of order dated 9th February 2026. However, we find that there is no need to do so as Mr.Lad, learned counsel for MHADA states that considering the letter dated 10th November 2025 issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, the Petitioner no.1 being held eligible, all the compliances would be undertaken. 2.

Removed from the board.

(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Date: 2026.02.17 10:17:20 +0530 MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE M.S.Thatte