Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 Mumbai v. Syntel Private Limited - Ay 2016-17 ITA 1972/Mum/2023

904-5-6-ITXA-615-620-329-.DOCX Chaitanya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAITANYA ASHOK JADHAV Date: 2025.04.17 14:47:45 +0530 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 615 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 ... Appellant

Versus

Syntel Limited ... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 620 OF 2016 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 ... Appellant

Versus

Syntel Limited ... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 329 OF 2025 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax ... Appellant

Versus

Syntel Private Limited ... Respondent ______________________________________________________ Mr P C Chhotaray, for Appellant/s.

Ms Aanchal Vyas i/b Mr Dharan Gandhi, for Respondent. ______________________________________________________ CORAM : M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.

DATED : 16 APRIL 2025

904-5-6-ITXA-615-620-329-.DOCX PC:- 1.

The Respondent-Assessees have applied for the benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. They have also produced the necessary Form-2 on record. 2.

Accordingly, Mr Chhotaray, learned counsel for the Appellant-Revenue, seeks leave to withdraw these Appeals with liberty to seek revival should the Assessees' Applications not finally going through.

3.

We grant leave with liberty as prayed for.

4.

These Appeals are disposed of leaving the questions of law open. Should the Assessees' Applications for settlement not finally go through, liberty is granted to the AppellantRevenue to seek revival of these Appeals by filing appropriate Applications within a reasonable period.

5.

The Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty in the above terms.

6.

The Appellants would be entitled to refund the Court fees in accordance with rules.

(Jitendra Jain, J) (M.S. Sonak, J)