Aarya Darshan Sheth A.K.A.Aarya Anjusha Chaughule v. Vikram Sharad Sheth And 6 ORS

Before : Anil H. Laddhad, Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 25th February, 2025 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL :

CHOL/388/2024 in SL/27598/2023 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Mr. Vinod Joshi, Advocate for the applicant.

None present for the respondents.

P.C.:

The present Chamber Order is taken out by the applicant for setting aside Order dated 20.02.2024, rejecting captioned Suit under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections.

Ld. Advocate for the applicant tenders Affidavit of Service dated 18.02.2024 and submits that respondents were served with the Chamber Order It is taken on record. It appears that despite service way back, the respondents not appeared in the matter.

Heard ld. Advocate for the applicant. Perused Affidavit in Support of the Chamber Order, contents of which are self-explanatory. It is averred that due to oversight, office objections were not removed within stipulated time.

Reason mentioned on oath, remains uncontested for want of resistance from the respondents. Hence, I do not hesitate to rely on the reason, as noted above, for restoration of captioned Suit. Hence, the present Chamber Order is granted as prayed and signed separately.

The plaintiff to remove office objections on the Suit and get the same registered and/or numbered within eight weeks from the date of uploading of Order, failing Suit to stand rejected for non-compliance of office objections under O.S.Rule 986.

Date : 25.02.2025 Prothonotary and Senior Master Digitally signed by RAJEEV VIJAY ACHARYA Date:

2025.02.26 10:38:15 +0530 RAJEEV VIJAY ACHARYA