Dinoo Dara Daruwalla v. Adi Sorabji Bharucha

Before : Sachin B. Bhansali Prothonotary and Senior Master Date : 13th November, 2024 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL :

21. CHOL/509/2024 IN TP(L)/20712/2022 ) ) ) Mr. Avadhkumar Bhoyar i/b. Mr. Sachin Masurkar, Advocate for the Petitioner / Applicant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) P.C. : The present Chamber Order is taken out for restoration of the captioned Petition, which was rejected vide Order dated 27.03.2024 for noncompliance of office objections under O.S. Rule 986. Perused Chamber Order, Affidavit in support to Chamber Order. Heard Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner / Applicant.

It is stated in Affidavit in support of Chamber Order that vide Minutes of Order dated 15.04.2024, time to remove office objections granted vide order dated 27.03.2024, was extended by one week from the date of uploading of order. So, Petitioner was supposed to remove office objections on or before 23.04.2024. Advocate appearing for the Petitioner submits that as per Exhibit 'B' i.e. Challan, Petitioner has complied with office objections with respect of payment of court fees of Rs. 75,000/- and nothing is remaining to be complied with by the Petitioner. Therefore, he submits that Chamber Order may be allowed and Petition may be restored to its original file. Considering grounds mentioned in the Affidavit in support of Chamber Order and submissions of Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner, as above, I am of the view that the Petitioner has made out a case for restoration of captioned Petition. Hence, present Chamber Order is granted as prayed.

Petitioner to remove office objections on the Petition .... 2

.... Continued Prothonotary and Senior Master Date : 13th November, 2024 : 2 :

) ) ) ) ) and get the same registered and/or numbered within two weeks from the date of uploading of order, failing the petition to stand rejected for non-compliance of office objections under O.S.Rule 986.

Date : 13.11.2024 Prothonotary & Senior Master