← Library
Bombay High CourtPIL/17/2024disposed off

Anuj Krishnakumar Mittal v. State Of Maharashtra

2025-04-16Hon'Ble The Chief Justice , Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik1 pages

5-PIL-17-2024.doc Pdp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 17 OF 2024 Anuj Krishnakumar Mittal & Ors.

.. Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents Mr. Subhash Jha a/w Rishikesh Soni and Ravindra Mali and Raveena Yaddav i/by Raveena Yaddav for petitioners. Mr. Vishal Thadani, Addl. Govt. Pleader with Smt. Rita Joshi, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 10-State.

Ms. Chaitalee Deochake i/by Komal Punjabi for respondent nos.2 to 5 - BMC.

Ms. Sayli Apte with Shreya Shah i/by P. G. Lad for respondent no.6-MHADA.

Mr. Sarosh Bharucha i/by Solicis Lex for respondent nos.7 to 9.

Mr. Satish Kamat for respondent no.11.

CORAM:

ALOK ARADHE, CJ. & M. S. KARNIK, J.

by PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date:

2025.04.16 19:02:34 +0530 PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT DATE:

16th APRIL, 2025 P.C.:

1.

Let rejoinder, if any, on behalf of the petitioner be filed within a period of one week. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.7 to 9 is at liberty to go through the same and to file an additional affidavit, if so advised, on or before the next date. A week's time is also granted to the learned counsel for the respondent no.6 to file affidavit-in-reply. 2.

List after two weeks.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)