Shamim Firoz Ramodiya (Caveatrix) v. Sharad Damodar Chitnis (Petitioner)

by MULEY SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO Date:

2025.03.12 10:06:39 +0530 MULEY SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO 1 49-CTS-131-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CAVEAT NO. 131 OF 2024 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 3326 OF 2023 Sharad Damodar Chitnis & Anr.

...Petitioners

Vs.

Shamim Firoz Ramodiya

...Respondent

----------------- Mr. Maaz Qureshi i/by Mukta Thapar for the Petitioners. Mr. Rakesh Singh a/w Kirthika K. for Nishar Porbunderwalla S/o Akbarali Porbunderwalla and Daulat Akbarali Porbunderwalla. Mr. P. Ranjan i/by Halai & Co. for the Caveator. ----------------- CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

DATE : 11TH MARCH, 2025 P.C.:- 1.

Learned Counsel for the Caveator today on instructions states that his client does not wish to contest the Testamentary Petition and his Caveat may be treated as being dismissed as withdrawn in view of the fact that there is since the filing of the Testamentary Petition a family settlement has been arrived at between the legal heirs of the deceased.

2.

Accepting this, Caveat is dismissed as withdrawn. Shubham 1/2

2 49-CTS-131-2024.doc 3.

Testamentary Registrar to proceed with the Testamentary Petition in accordance with law subject to compliance of all necessary office requisitions. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) Shubham 2/2