← Library
Bombay High CourtCARBP/316/2024disposed off

Ghanshyam Rameshbhai Upadhyay v. Sakshi Saurabh Dant - Jain

2024-10-09Hon'Ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor2 pages

by MULEY SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO Date:

2024.10.10 18:52:14 +0530 MULEY SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO 1 14-CARBP-316-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 316 OF 2024 Ghanshyam Rameshbhai Upadhyay

...Petitioner

Vs.

Sakshi Saurabh Dant - Jain

...Respondent

----------------- Mr. Darshit Jain i/by Divya Jain for the Petitioner. ----------------- CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

DATE : 9TH OCTOBER, 2024 P.C.:- 1.

The captioned Petition is filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that an Arbitrator has already been appointed pursuant to an order of this Court dated 9 th September, 2024. He submits that the incomplete construction which was partially developed by the Respondent is in the possession of certain third parties and it is therefore, the present Section 9 Petition has been filed. However, he submits that today the Petitioner has filed a Section 17 application which is pending before the Tribunal for the very same purpose. It is thus he seeks leave to withdraw the present Section 9 Petition.

Shubham 1/2

2 14-CARBP-316-2024.doc 3.

The Petition is thus dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is made clear that in the event the Tribunal is unable to grant effective relief, then the Petitioner shall be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings before this Court. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) Shubham 2/2