Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited v. Shantanu Debabrata Datta

1/1 51-CARBP-332-2024 (OS).DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 332 OF 2024 Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited

...Petitioner

Versus

Shantanu Debabrata Datta & Ors.

...Respondents

WITH COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO.99 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 332 OF 2024 _______ Ms. Nelly Mehta i/b NMA Legal, for the Petitioner. Mr. Arun Mehta i/b Akshar Laws, for Respondent No.3. Mr. Deepak S. Bhalerao, Second Assistant to Court Receiver, present. _______ CORAM :

ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

nd JANUARY, 2026 DATE :

P.C.

1.

A request for time was made on the ground that the parties are attempting to amicably resolve their disputes and differences. There is already an order passed under Section 9, of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 2.

Hence, at the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, stand over to th February 2026.

[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Vaibhav