Tata Motors Finance Limited v. Sri Hanuman Transport

915-CARBP-340-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 340 OF 2024 Tata Motors Finance Limited

...Petitioner

Versus

Sri Hanuman Transport & Ors.

...Respondents

Adv. Kunjita Shah, for the i/b IV Merchant & Co. for the Petitioner. Mrs. Nandini Deshpande, 1st Assistant to Court Receiver. Appearance not received from the Respondents.

CORAM:

SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

DATE:

JUNE 10, 2026 ORDER :

1.

Since an Arbitral Tribunal has already been appointed, nothing survives in this Petition. Liberty is granted to pursue proceedings under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the Learned Arbitral Tribunal, which is already seized of the matter. Therefore, this Petition is finally disposed of.

JUNE 10, 2026 Rutuja Borse

915-CARBP-340-2024.doc 2.

Since no action has been taken despite appointment of the Court Receiver, the Court Receiver stands discharged without the need for passing of accounts, and subject to payment of applicable fees by the Petitioner. 3.

The Petitioner has liberty to seek such reliefs as it desires from the Learned Arbitral Tribunal instead.

4.

All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court's website. [ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] JUNE 10, 2026 Rutuja Borse