State Bank Of India v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(2)(1), Mumbai,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.411 OF 2025 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.32703 OF 2023 State Bank of India .. Appellant/Applicant

Versus

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(2)(1), Mumbai .. Respondent Digitally signed by UTKARSH KAKASAHEB BHALERAO Date:

2025.07.24 10:28:21 +0530 Mr.Atul K. Jasani, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. UTKARSH KAKASAHEB BHALERAO

CORAM

: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

DATE : JULY 23, 2025 P. C.

1.

The above Praecipe has been moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 9th July 2025. It is stated that in the cause title of the said order, the year of the Income Tax Appeal is wrongly mentioned as "2024" when the same should be "2023". 2.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the cause title of the order dated 9th July 2025, for the words "INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.32703 OF 2024", the words "INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.32703 OF 2023" shall be substituted.

3.

No other correction is sought. The correction shall be carried out in the original order as well as in the copy uploaded on the server.

4.

The Praecipe for speaking to the minutes is accodingly disposed of.

5.

Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] For the sake of convenience the order dated 9th July 2025 (as corrected) reproduced hereunder:-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 411 OF 2025 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL(L)NO. 32703 OF 2023 State Bank of India .. Appellant/Applicant

Versus

Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Central Circle-2 (2) (1), Mumbai .. Respondent Mr. Atul K. Jasani, Advocates for the Appellant/Applicant. Mr. N. C. Mohanty, Advocates for the Respondent. CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

DATE:

JULY 9, 2025 P. C.

1.

The above Interim Application is filed seeking a condonation of delay of 1 day in filing the above Appeal. For the reasons stated in the above Interim Application, the delay is condoned. 2.

Now that the delay is condoned, the learned advocates for the Appellant/Applicant shall remove all other office objections, if any, within a period of four weeks from today, failing which the above Appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. 3.

The above Interim Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

4.

Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA,J.] [B. P. COLABAWALLA,J.]